requestId:684aed7dac76e0.14303180.
Natural reason and salvation—The prototype of the self-practical and thoughtful and historical meaning of Tang Wugong Presentation
Author: Chen Yang (Department of Philosophy, Tongji University of Humanities)
Source: Author Author Authorized by Confucian Network Published
Original from Jimei Daobao Journal 2017 href=”https://twsweetdiary.org/honeydating/%e5%be%9e%e6%af%8f%e5%80%8b%e6%9c%88%e7%b5%a6%e6%88%9120%e8%90%ac%e7%9a%84daddy%e8%ae%8a%e6%88%90%e6%88%91%e7%9a%84%e8%80%81%e5%85%ac/”>号4
Time: Confucius was in the 2568th year of Dingyou November 11th Ji Chou
Jesus December 28, 2017
【Content summary】
Precaution and self-reliance are the cornerstone of Confucianism’s learning of correcting people. During the period of the People’s Republic of China, the chief teacher of the Tang Wugong Teachers was very popular in his works “Big Issues” and “Recently, a knowledge competition program with a doctor as the protagonist. The meaning of the Confucian “being cautious and independent” kung fu in “The Book of Salvation of the World” and “The Book of Nature and Reason”. This type of phrase has a very clear real direction, which is to invent traditional and cautious learning to save the world today. In the Tang Wugong’s Shenxian commentary, the focus has attracted the ideological resources of a series of mind-study scholars since the late Ming Dynasty, especially Liu Zongzhou’s explanation of Shenxian. This thought led the Tang family to emerge from the Qianlong and Jiaqing academic field in the Qing Dynasty, and explored the reconstruction of the theory with the detailed psychological field of Yang Ming. The “cautious” commentary on the “scrupulous” of studying Tang Wugong since the late Ming Dynasty is the main way to deeply explore its value of thinking and political and educational meanings.
【Keyword】
Tang Wugong, be cautious, rational, and save the world
[Comment】
Shengyi is one of the main methods of cultivation in Confucianism. In the 20th century Chinese academic history, there are two ways to describe the importance of being cautious and independent: one is to determine the connotation and position of being cautious and independent through comparison with the Oriental Thought Correlation, and the other is to position one’s cautious and independent by returning to the traditional academic thinking Correlation. The former is like the teacher of the new Confucianism of Hong Kong, and the latter has a brief explanation from the Tang and Wusong Song Dynasty: “It was received in the community, about five or six months old, and the teacher of the master. For example, Mou Zongsan believes that being cautious and independent is the basic focus of Chinese civilization. Its basis is: “Confucianism also emphasizes creation, but does not use God to create all things in Liuhe; the reality of creation is to understand our moral creation, so nature and Taoism are one. Therefore, Confucianism opens the main body and emphasizes the reality of morality. How to present a manifested body? Rely on being cautious. Therefore, opening the door of the main body is to open the skill of caution. Christianity never takes the skill of caution, so it cannot be said: We can become Jesus by virtue of our moral integrity. ”[1] This is to compare with the metaphysical learning of Eastern subjectivity and Christian thinking, be careful to think independently. [2] Tang Wugong is to slap the QianBaoqing.com VIPThe basics of Chinese academic disastrous academic disparities since Jia Jia, by memorizing the traditions of Song and Ming dynasties, and describing the modern political and religious meaning of careful thinking. The remarks of Tang Wugong can better highlight the contradictions of classical science and have extremely clear practical directions, which is worth our further exploration.
Tang Wugong (1865-1954), whose courtesy name is Weizhi, was a late-nation Ruzhu. He was a famous teacher and master of national education who combined virtue, merit and learning in modern times. This article takes Tang’s comments on Confucian “carelessness” in his works, “Big Identity”, “Damn Meaning” and “Natural Reasons and Reasons” [3] as an example. He will discuss this and teach the Fang family.
1. Be cautious and support the spirit and serve the heaven
Tang Wugong’s cautious and independent comments are the focus of his “nature reasoning is the foundation of salvation”. This initiative is not a pedantic argument without ignoring the reality of the times, but a tree standing on the ills of the times In-depth insight into the basic strategy of saving the world. As we all know, the late Qing Dynasty was a period of great change in the era of Chen China that had not been seen in three thousand years. At this time, as a practical and teacher, Tang Wugong, his teaching philosophy was “sought on reality and practice”, and he worked hard to cultivate and cultivate talents in practical use and cheer up China’s practical talents. Combined with this practical philosophy, Tang Wugong’s sexual theory (be carefulInclusive learning) Comment on integrating traditional thinking resourcesConsumer contracts and modern civilization show a clear and contemporary character. The conception of this description is: “There is no basis for correcting people’s learning to be cautious. Since later generations broke the saying of “Safety and Indifference”, they thought it was empty and empty, and doing things would be more jealous. “(“State of the “Sincere” by Tang Wugong’s “Big Identity”) This so-called descendants refer to the Qianjia Confucian Confucians represented by Dai Zhen. In the eyes of Tang Wugong, the academic tasks of Qing Confucians such as Dai Zhen destroyed the worldly and people’s hearts that were built by Song and Ming Technological Academics, and can even be regarded as the source of the continuous decline of social politics and moral conditions in the late Qing Dynasty. Tang Wugong’s “Salvation of Nature and Reason·Subjectory of the Words” 》The opening of the article is to analyze the argument using the method of self-inspection:
Or it is said that the meaning of the word “reason” is cleansed in the empty space, and it was early to be destroyed by Dai Dongyuan and Jiao Rongtang. Is it a mistake to say that the reason is not contrary to? I responded to it: This is a discussion of the lack of prosperity and so on. ·······Dai’s words and principles of the Confucian scholars of the Song Dynasty were a matter of purging the empty space, and if you want to remove it, it would be in vain and overcorrect, and it would be ruthless. href=”https://twsharestory.com/”>原文 must remove its inherent nature. Once it is removed, it must remove its original kindness, kindness, wisdom and wisdom. Therefore, the unrestrained hearts are in absent and unquestionable way, and the world will not be able to be asked. Therefore, it is said: A correct person thinks that one word is knowledge, and a word is not known. If one word is not done, he will be careless.” (Tang Wugong’s “Salvation of the World of Nature and Reason·The Original Text of the Word of Comprehension”)
Academics have the most original political and educational meaning, which is the confidence of the classical civilization held by Tang Wugong. In his opinion, the impact of academic undermining is invaluable on society; therefore, criticism and improper academic undermining is also an indispensable part of upholding worldly education and a gentleman’s heart. Tang Wugong believed that Dai Zhen was in vain and overcorrect when criticizing the Song and Ming dynasties and the natural principles of the Song and Ming dynasties, and eliminated the loss of the inherent moral concepts of everyone, forming a rude heart and a ruling world. Dai Zhen was a famous examiner during the Qianlong and Jiaqing period, and was named “the first student in Qianlong” (Chapter 1) [4]. He fiercely criticized Song Ming’s “killing people with reason”, and undoubtedly asked Dai Zhen’s most controversial and influential academic thinking task. Tang Wugong also long-term care treatment of the person’s body, and criticized Dai Zhen’s words as “a discussion on the old meaning of lack of prosperity”; Tang’s article “The Book of the Words of Discussion” has a detailed and layer-by-layer statement of Dai Zhen. Due to the length of the article, the content of the training and interpretation will not be discussed in this article. The most important part of this literature is the meaning of “distinguishing the mind and mind” against Dai Zhen. There is a major point in Dai Zhen’s criticism of physiognomy., believed that the Confucians of the Song Dynasty “take opinion as reason.” He came up with a conclusion based on what Mencius said, “The sage first got the same thing as my heart” (Mencius: Gaozi 1)) that a view that has n